Copyable Data Tables

Select and copy these tables directly into Google Sheets or Excel

Table 1: Raw Data

Configuration Pressure (mmHg) DTI (hours) STII Damage Fraction
Standard Foam 65.30 1.00 10.12 4.39
Alternating Checkerboard 65.30 1.00 10.12 4.39
Horizontal Wave 64.80 1.00 10.04 4.34
Vertical Wave 65.30 1.00 10.12 4.39
Zone-Based Adaptive 45.30 2.80 6.96 1.67
Circular Wave 63.50 1.00 9.83 4.22
Diagonal Wave 64.90 1.00 10.03 4.34
Row Groups (size=1) 65.30 1.00 10.12 4.39
Row Groups (size=2) 47.40 1.90 7.33 1.79
Row Groups (size=3) 42.70 2.70 6.61 1.87
Multi-Frequency Zones 65.30 1.00 10.12 4.39
Sequential Rows 65.30 1.00 10.12 4.39
Evolved Optimal 39.90 5.20 6.16 1.07

Table 2: Percent Change from Baseline

Configuration Pressure Change (%) DTI Change (%) STII Change (%) Damage Reduction (%)
Standard Foam Baseline Baseline Baseline 0.0
Alternating Checkerboard +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 0.0
Horizontal Wave -0.8 +0.0 -0.8 1.1
Vertical Wave +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 0.0
Zone-Based Adaptive -30.6 +180.0 -31.2 62.0
Circular Wave -2.8 +0.0 -2.9 3.9
Diagonal Wave -0.6 +0.0 -0.9 1.1
Row Groups (size=1) +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 0.0
Row Groups (size=2) -27.4 +90.0 -27.6 59.2
Row Groups (size=3) -34.6 +170.0 -34.7 57.4
Multi-Frequency Zones +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 0.0
Sequential Rows +0.0 +0.0 +0.0 0.0
Evolved Optimal -38.9 +420.0 -39.1 75.6

Table 3: Statistical Analysis

Test Result
Linear Regression DTI = -0.1086 × Pressure + 8.01
R-squared (R²) 0.7968
p-value < 0.001 (significant)
Interpretation 79.7% of variance explained

Best Configuration: Evolved Optimal

Metric Value
Pressure Reduction -38.9%
DTI Improvement +420.0%
STII Reduction -39.1%
Damage Reduction 75.6%
DTI Efficiency 520%