Copyable Data Tables

Select and copy these tables directly into Google Sheets or Excel

Table 1: Raw Data

Configuration	Pressure (mmHg)	DTI (hours)	STII	Damage Fraction
Standard Foam	65.30	1.00	10.12	4.39
Alternating Checkerboard	65.30	1.00	10.12	4.39
Horizontal Wave	64.80	1.00	10.04	4.34
Vertical Wave	65.30	1.00	10.12	4.39
Zone-Based Adaptive	45.30	2.80	6.96	1.67
Circular Wave	63.50	1.00	9.83	4.22
Diagonal Wave	64.90	1.00	10.03	4.34
Row Groups (size=1)	65.30	1.00	10.12	4.39
Row Groups (size=2)	47.40	1.90	7.33	1.79
Row Groups (size=3)	42.70	2.70	6.61	1.87
Multi-Frequency Zones	65.30	1.00	10.12	4.39
Sequential Rows	65.30	1.00	10.12	4.39
Evolved Optimal	39.90	5.20	6.16	1.07

Table 2: Percent Change from Baseline

Configuration	Pressure Change (%)	DTI Change (%)	STII Change (%)	Damage Reduction (%)
Standard Foam	Baseline	Baseline	Baseline	0.0
Alternating Checkerboard	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0	0.0
Horizontal Wave	-0.8	+0.0	-0.8	1.1
Vertical Wave	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0	0.0
Zone-Based Adaptive	-30.6	+180.0	-31.2	62.0
Circular Wave	-2.8	+0.0	-2.9	3.9
Diagonal Wave	-0.6	+0.0	-0.9	1.1
Row Groups (size=1)	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0	0.0
Row Groups (size=2)	-27.4	+90.0	-27.6	59.2
Row Groups (size=3)	-34.6	+170.0	-34.7	57.4
Multi-Frequency Zones	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0	0.0
Sequential Rows	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0	0.0
Evolved Optimal	-38.9	+420.0	-39.1	75.6

Table 3: Statistical Analysis

Test	Result
Linear Regression	DTI = -0.1086 × Pressure + 8.01
R-squared (R²)	0.7968
p-value	< 0.001 (significant)
Interpretation	79.7% of variance explained

Best Configuration: Evolved Optimal

Metric	Value
Pressure Reduction	-38.9%
DTI Improvement	+420.0%
STII Reduction	-39.1%
Damage Reduction	75.6%
DTI Efficiency	520%